In re: Guardianship of Mull, 7th Dist. Case No. 15 BE 11, 2015-Ohio-5440. Recognizing that a trustee is a fiduciary like an executor is a fiduciary, the Seventh District held that a decision denying the removal of a trustee is a final appealable order. While the action before the probate court was a declaratory-judgment action to determine which amended trust was valid, the appellate court determined that the probate court's decision not to remove the trustee was a provisional remedy pursuant to R.C. § 2505.02. The provisional order was considered a final appealable order because, if the trustee is mishandling the trust, the beneficiaries are deprived of meaningful remedy to address the mishandling of trust assets. According, the appellate court determined that the removal of an executor falls within the category of provisional remedies of which there is no meaningful or effective remedy could be granted upon appeal following the final resolution of the estate.
Recent Posts
- Jessica Forrest and Brittany Kaczmarczyk Secure Unanimous Jury Verdict for Trust Beneficiaries
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: A Growing Source of Probate Litigation
- 13 Reminger Estate & Trust Attorneys Recognized in 2025 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
- Jessica Forrest Appointed Akron Bar Association Vice President of Membership
- Estate Plans Can Help Avoid Probate Court
- Jessica Forrest Named a Notable Woman in Law by Crain's Cleveland Business
- Adam Fried Provides Testimony Opposing Ohio HB 172
- Welcome, Michael Brody!
- Changing Addresses with the USPS… not so fast
- Family Disputes can Wreak Havoc with Estate Planning