Guardianship of Edema Cardine Carpenter, Third Appellate District, Marion County, 2016-Ohio-3389. This case stands for the proposition that, even though a person has been determined incompetent and a guardian appointed over him or her, the Ward retains certain rights, including those to have their personal opinions considered, to speak privately with an attorney or another advocate, to petition the Court to modify guardianship, and to bring a grievance against the guardian. Additionally, when the guardian's interests are adverse to the Ward, the Court shall appoint a Guardian Ad Litem pursuant to Revised Code Section 2111.23. When award is denied due process to have his or her interest represented in a guardianship proceeding challenging the decision making of the guardian or otherwise seeking the modifier terminated guardianship, it is a violation of due process warranting reversal of a probate judge's decision in such a matter.
Recent Posts
- Jessica Forrest and Brittany Kaczmarczyk Secure Unanimous Jury Verdict for Trust Beneficiaries
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty: A Growing Source of Probate Litigation
- 13 Reminger Estate & Trust Attorneys Recognized in 2025 Edition of Best Lawyers in America
- Jessica Forrest Appointed Akron Bar Association Vice President of Membership
- Estate Plans Can Help Avoid Probate Court
- Jessica Forrest Named a Notable Woman in Law by Crain's Cleveland Business
- Adam Fried Provides Testimony Opposing Ohio HB 172
- Welcome, Michael Brody!
- Changing Addresses with the USPS… not so fast
- Family Disputes can Wreak Havoc with Estate Planning